Ian Munro (BA University of British Columbia, PhD Harvard)
specializes in early modern English theater. His research
interests include European drama and performance, critical
theory, urban space and representation, early modern popular
culture, crowds and audiences, connections between the theater
and print culture, the space of the Shakespearean stage, and
the theatrical performance of wit.
He
is the author of The Figure of the Crowd in Early Modern London:
The City and its Double (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), which explores
the relationship between early modern perceptions of the crowd and
perceptions of London. Examining the topos of the crowd in the
context of a wide variety of drama and entertainments, it argues
that the crowd was the visible manifestation of an increasingly
incomprehensible city, the tangible referent onto which the desires
and fears provoked by London's swelling mass were projected. The
book's central concern is thus what happens to urban space when it
becomes crowded: what happens, in social and symbolic terms, to a
city in a population crisis-especially a city that understands itself
so much through the public performance of culture. In both the streets
and the playhouses the crowd acted as a supplement to the material and
conceptual space of the city, transforming the social and symbolic
dynamics of urban meaning. This supplemental structure is particularly
important in the context of theatrical representation: by staging or
invoking crowds, plays link the bounded space of their drama to the
theatrical space of their performance, articulating the contradictions
inherent to staging an urban world through the relationship between the staged play and its London audience.
Current
projects include Laughing Matter: The Publication and Performance of
Wit in Early Modern England, which focuses on the relationship between
theatrical wit and the vast expansion of printing in the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries. It contends that despite the oral and
extemporaneous nature of theatrical jesting, the Renaissance
fascination with the performance of wit was catalyzed and shaped most
profoundly by the growth of print culture. In this regard, the
performance of wit cannot be isolated from the widespread publication
of witty matter. "Performance" and "publication" thus characterize a
crucial cultural tension, one that finds its most significant location
in the early modern theater and its most concentrated expression in the
genre of popular literature known as the jestbook. As the subtitle
suggests, the project is built around interconnections between the
theater and the marketplace of print, two emerging cultural institutions
that have remained largely and artificially separated in critical
analysis. The overarching goal of the project is to identify the social,
political, and material determinants of jesting, and to produce a
critical and theoretical language capable of linking and framing the
diverse significances of the publication and performance of wit.
As
part of his work on jesting, he has edited A Woman's Answer is Never to
Seek: Early Modern Jestbooks, 1526-1635 for Ashgate Press's "Early Modern
Englishwoman" series (2007). This collection brings together a half-dozen
jestbooks that offer a wide, important, and often overlooked perspective
on the representation and lived experience of women in early modern England.
Recent articles and book chapters have discussed the influence of jestbooks
on Much Ado about Nothing, the production of wit in John Marston's The
Malcontent, structures of publicity in Thomas Middleton's A Game at Chess,
figurations of orality in the plays of the Queen's Men, and the urban noir
of Ben Jonson's The Devil is an Ass. In recent theatrical work, he has
worked as a dramaturg with Robert Cohen (Timon of Athens, Endgame), Phil
Thompson (Measure for Measure), and Eli Simon (A Flea in Her Ear, Sunday
in the Park with George, West Side Story).

|